Áèáëèîòåêà >> Ìåòîä ôîêóñ-ãðóïï
Ñêà÷àòü 191.38 Êáàéò Ìåòîä ôîêóñ-ãðóïï
Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 2:305-328.
226. Charmaz, Ê. (1983). The Grounded Theory Method: An Explication and Interpretation. In Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings. R. M. Emerson, ed. Pp. 109-126. Boston* Little, Brown. 227. Charmaz, K. (1990). «Discovering» Chronic Illness: Using Grounded Theory. Social Science and Medicine 30:1161-1172. 228. Chenitz, W. C, andJ. M. Swanson, eds. (1986). From Practice to Grounded Theory, Menio Park, CA: Addison-Wesley. 229. Conrad, P. , and S. Reinhanz, eds. (1984). Computers and Qualitative Data [Special Issue]. Qualitative Sociology. 230. Cook, Thomas D. , and Charles Reichardt. eds. (1979). Qualitative and quantitative Methods in Research Evalution Beverly Hills: Sage. 231. Denzin, Norman K. (1987). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-ÍØ Book Company (see especially pp. 105, 196-201; 236-24000. 232. Denzin, Norman Ê-, and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage. 233. Eisner, EW. (1979). The Educational Imagination. New-York Basic Books. 234. Fetterman, David, ed. (1988). Qualitative Approaches to Evalution in Education: The Silent Scientific Revolution New York: Praeger. 235. Fricke, John G. , and Raj Gill (1989). Participative Evalutions. Canadian Journal of Evalution 4: 11-26 236. Gilgun, Jane F. , Kerry Daly, and Gerald Handel, eds. (1992). Qualitative Methods in Family Research. Newbury Park: Sage. 237. Glaser, Â. , and A. L. Strauss (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory Chicago: Aldine. 238. Grabtree, enjamin F, and William L Miller (1992). Dotng Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 239. Guba, Egon G. (1981). Criteria for Assessing the Tmstworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology A Journal of Theory, Research and Development (ECTJ). 29:75-91. 240. Guba Egon G. , and Yvonna S. Lincoln (1981). Effective Evalution: Improving the Selfulness of Evalution Results Through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches. San Francis- ñî: Jossey-Bass. 241. Guba Egon G. , and Yvonna S. Lincoln (1989). Fourth Generation Evalution Sage. Holland, Dorothy, and Naomi Quinn, eds. (1987) Cultural Models in Language and Thought Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 242. Kirk, Jeromt, and Marc Miller (1986). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Newbury Park: Sage. 243. Kvale, S. (1986). Interpretation of the Qualitative Research Interview. In Advances in Qualitative Psychology: Themes and Variations. F. J, Van Zuuren, F. J. Wertz, and B. Mook, eds. 244. LeCompte, M. D. , and J. P. Goetz (1982). Problems of Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Review of Educational Research 52:31-60. 245. Lincoln, Y. S. , and EG Guba (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 246. Maquet, J. J. (1964). Objectivity in Anthropology. Current Anthropology 5:47-55. 247. Milles, Matthew Â, and Michael Huberman (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 248. Morris, Lynn L, Carol Ò Fitz-Gibbon, and Marie E Freeman (1987). How to Communicate Evalution Findings. Newbury Park: Sage. 249. Mostyn, Barbara (1985). The Content Analysis of Qualitative Research Data: A Dynamic Approach In The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches. Brenner, M. , J. Broun, and D. Canter, eds. pp. 115-145. London: Academic Press. 250. Patton, M. (1980). Qualitative evalution methods. Beverly Hills. CA: Sage. 251. Patton, Michael Quinn (1981). Practical Evalution. Beverly Hills: Sage. 252. Patton, Michael Quinn (1986. Utilization-Focused Evalution 2nd ed. Beverly Hills: Sage) Ñòðàíèöû:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
| ||
|